Talk:Book of Concord/Archive May 20, 2006

- I do hope that this is not another CPH ad. This is becoming tiresome. -Rekleov 22:04, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This is yet another CPH ad, and left without attribution. Whoever is dropping these materials all over the Wikipedia, please stop. This is becoming tiresome, and does nothing for the reputation of CPH --- especially when useful and relevant information is blasted away. -Rekleov 22:13, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This latest replacement of the BoC page is yet another CPH ad, and left without attribution. Whoever is dropping these materials all over the Wikipedia, please stop. This is becoming tiresome, and does nothing for the reputation of CPH --- especially when useful and relevant information is blasted away. -Rekleov 22:13, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Note to ptmccain: removal of "talk" pages without consultation is without cause. Learn to live with criticism, mild though it may be. Thank you. --Rekleov 01:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

"This latest replacement of the BoC page is yet another CPH ad"

The comment is wrong and inappropriate. It implies that Concordia Publishing House is "placing ads" on Wikipedia, which is not the case. The assertion is factually in error and as such misleading to readers. I would appreciate if it stayed off this site.


 * I am sorry if these notes come across as implying that CPH placed these entries. They did, however, not only read as ads, they were often direct-from-CPH copy.  Whoever was placing these entries was not doing CPH any favors, and my intent was to get them to realize this, and stop their activities --- it seems that my attempts to defend CPH's good name were not as clear as they might have been.  I am sorry for any misunderstandings on this matter.  --Rekleov 04:21, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

I am restoring the deleted material from this talk page. On Wikipedia it is not the practice to remove another's comments on a talk page unless it is to put it on an archive page. Please leave the comments of someone else. Respond to them, but do not remove them. drboisclair 00:09, 19 April 2006 (UTC)