Talk:Book smarts and street smarts

Proposed merger to Know-how
I oppose the proposed merger, as the broader cultural conception of book smarts and street smarts is distinct from the "industrial know-how" that makes up the bulk of the article on "know-how". bd2412 T 21:12, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Very well, I will remove the merge template since it is unlikely that anyone else will see it and offer another opinion. Notice, however, that the lead of Know-how is clear that the article subject covers exactly the same cultural/semantic range that this article covers. The fact that the rest of the article does not cover the whole semantic range indicated in the article's lead is merely a sign that the article is incomplete, i.e., that the article needs the kind of information that you appear to have intended to provide when you started this draft. Adding such information to the existing article on street smarts (which redirects to know-how) would be a needed contribution to that article. Biogeographist (talk) 02:12, 21 June 2019 (UTC)