Talk:Borane(5)

Merge proposal
Borane(5) is interesting but it has virtually no existence outside of a computer. Hence its ChemBox will remain largely empty. What little one can say about this material are principally of interest in the context of that other fleeting species borane(3). So for these reasons, I recommend merging. Others might disagree, but I am thinking about readers gaining a satisfying account of a narrow but interesting topic.--Smokefoot (talk) 19:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * No objection (belatedly...I see you have already merged it). DMacks (talk) 23:37, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * It's existense was confirmed. We should seperate Borane(5) again. --Sharouser (talk) 11:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)