Talk:Borealis Exploration

Deletion
How about waiting a sec while I finish writing the damn page. The company owns a bunch of subsidieries, and tons of patents. I saw it in Popular Science like 4 years ago, which almost speaks for itself as assertion of importance. Why don't you try searching for media coverage before you tag something for speedy? Fresheneesz 22:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I've asserted significance (the efficiency thing) and sourced it. A7 no longer holds. Fresheneesz 22:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Criteria for companies and corporations
REF: WP:CORP

A company or corporation is notable if it meets any of the following criteria:
 * 1) The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or corporation itself.
 * 2) * This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations except for the following:
 * 3) ** Media reprints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about itself, and advertising for the company.
 * 4) ** Works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that simply report extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories.
 * 5) The company or corporation is listed on ranking indices of important companies produced by well-known and independent publications.
 * 6) The company's or corporation's share price is used to calculate stock market indices. Being used to calculate an index that simply comprises the entire market is excluded.

I do not find that this criteria has been met. I also suggest you review WP:CIVIL. The tone of your commeny on my talk page as well as this talk page does not demonstrate that you WP:AGF on my part. Jerry lavoie 22:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I've provided multiple non-trivial sources... What more do you want? I'm sorry about my tone, but I don't like having to defend my work when its extremely easy to go and find sources for it. Suggesting a speedy delete while i'm working on it is not very good tact. I'll assume good faith, but don't try to delete my work based on shaky reasoning like A7 - i've asserted significance. Please put this up on WP:AfD so that this can be setteled. Fresheneesz 22:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Firstly, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I am not interested in being your foe.  I had no way to know you were editing the article.  If you feel strongly that this article meets the notability criteria, I'll back off.Jerry lavoie 22:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

As the company has been covered by Motor Trend magazine (www.MotorTrend.com/features/editorial/112_0901_flying_hybrids_technologue/index.html), Airforce-Techonology.com (www.Airforce-Technology.com/features/feature74127/) and other publications (like Air Transportation World) have covered a subsidiary that liscences it's techonology, I think the company is notable. Chovesh (talk) 18:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Subsidiary merge-ins
Chorus Motors and Wheeltug should be merged to here. Other subsidiaries already redirect to here. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  20:06, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Borealis Exploration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100818053150/http://www.wheeltug.gi/press/pr_WT20100201.shtml to http://www.wheeltug.gi/press/pr_WT20100201.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Borealis Exploration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130626064731/http://www.pse.cz/Novinky/Detail.aspx?ka=2822 to https://www.pse.cz/Novinky/Detail.aspx?ka=2822

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)