Talk:Boroughs of Munich

Is the Munich article long enough? I think it's at least better to merge this article with that of Munich's. -Pika ten10 (talk) 02:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Reasons for the merging...
Again, I would reiterate that this article must be merged with the subdivisions section of the Munich article since the section is not explained thoroughly. It only says there (in the Munich article) that there are 25 boroughs comprising Munich without information what are these boroughs. Any additional short information about these boroughs can be helpful for readers; however, do not expound on those info. -Pika ten10 (talk) 06:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC) Take note that the information we have here is something that must be explained instead in the Munich article. I have seen in this article's edit page that one will put there the history of each of the boroughs. Although I believe Munich and its boroughs are rich in history, I cannot allow this since we will have very little information on the historical highlights of each of the boroughs. I think those short info can be put instead on the article about Munich, unless those info can exceed the maximum article length required in Wiki. -Pika ten10 (talk) 06:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC) Anyone offended on my words. Please accept my pardon and put your complaints on my talk page. Thank you for reading my messages. -Pika ten10 (talk) 06:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

But I think this would only require a partial merger. If the whole thing is mergered, then the Boroughs of Munich should be a redirect to that section in the Munich article. In this article, it can be as detailed as can be. Kingjeff (talk) 21:55, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm against a complete merger. Keeping the other article boroughs of Munich makes sense since the list of the older division is far too long for a section in the Munich article. This older division is important for historical reasons and I'm sure this will be expanded soon enough: Munich celebrates a "birthday" in 2008. Pika ten10, can you give us a reason why there is a must to merge both articles? Einemnet (talk) 13:13, 25 December 2007 (UTC)