Talk:Boston Consulting Group's Advantage Matrix

Hi, I think this link should be added as a reference to the article. I'll leave it to a more experienced editor to add. I need to play in the sandpit before I try edit any article pages myself :) Anyhow here's the link http://www.bcg.com/publications/files/Experience_Curve_IV_Growth_Share_Matrix_1973.pdf 123.208.35.102 (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

I did a general reorganization of the page. Information regarding the growth-share matrix was removed but there is a link to the growth-share matrix article included. References were added as well as an image and other details. Steelpulse90 (talk) 15:03, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boston Consulting Group's Advantage Matrix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130314112208/http://www.bcg.com/about_bcg/history/history_1981.aspx to http://www.bcg.com/about_bcg/history/history_1981.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Questionable neutrality
It seems to me that this reads like an advert for BCG. I find sentences like "Apart from the fact that it has not suffered as badly at the hands of later popularizers, the particular advantage of this matrix" particularly alarming. I don't really know anything about what constitutes improper behaviour on wikipedia, but it seems like some of this language extends to other BCG articles.

Quevenski (talk) 11:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)