Talk:Boston Manor tube station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 22:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Giving a look. —Ed!(talk) 22:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written:
 * Pass Dab links, dup links, external links tools show no problems. Copyio tool returns yellow thanks to similar wording to one of the sources. Any chance you can do a bit to differentiate the wording?
 * Apparently, the last time I checked the detector if there are any issues the website wasn't there. Perhaps it's a mirror website? Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 06:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * Source spotcheck Refs 12, 27 and 32 all property back up cited details in the article.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage:
 * Not Yet
 * Is there larger context about the planning and design for the line itself and what prompted this site specifically for a station?
 * Can't find much about why Boston Manor was chosen as one of the locations for a stop but I elaborated a small idea for its connection to another railway. Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 06:45, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Location: Any chance for details on local population in a walking distance to this station or ridership along the line?
 * Same reason as in the Becontree station article. Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 06:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * History: What was the construction company that built the initial station? How much did it cost? And an architect for the original building?
 * Construction company was DR, how much and the architect, I don't have details since the Charles Holden structure got more coverage. Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 06:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * What was the architectural style of the original building?
 * I can only describe it as the typical DR style building. You can take a look at the pic ref. Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 06:49, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * What's the square footage of the new building?
 * Can't find details for this though sorry :( Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 06:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Any more detail on what specifically will be done to the station for the 2022 update?
 * ❌ nope, Tfl didn't provide any additional detail for this. Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 06:12, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Any chance for station succession data (neighboring stations) as is included in many NYC Metro station articles?
 * What exactly is this? Are you thinking of a routebox - the article already has one, at Boston Manor tube station. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 12:10, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, that works. —Ed!(talk) 13:58, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is stable:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * Pass Six images tagged PD and CC where appropriate.
 * 1) Other:
 * On Hold Pending some improvements. —Ed!(talk) 23:29, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Again, I pretty much addressed most of the issues, . Is this good to go? Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 06:49, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

OK. I think you've got the gist of anything major I was thinking of. Based on these improvements, going to Pass the GAN. Thanks for your responses! —Ed!(talk) 20:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC)