Talk:Botanical sexism

Neutrality?
why do you consider the article biased? --awkwafaba (📥) 16:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * there is currently only a single sentence that covers criticism of the Botanical sexism hypothesis, thus the majority of the article is tilted towards the concept being accepted and valid. additionally the last sentence is very vague and handwavy, not addressing any specifics at all, while the rest off the article calls out specifics and heavily relies on news articles which are noted to be poor science topic sources.-- Kev min  § 19:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * @Kevmin I have added a criticism section. Does this address your concerns? Finq (talk) 17:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The expanded Criticism section looks good indeed, and since this has been a bit of a flash in the pan topic, I think its good for now as nothing huge seems to be happening now on either side.-- Kev min  § 18:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)