Talk:Bound for Glory IV

Sting VS Joe
This was just announced at the end of the No Surrender PPV.


 * Bring me a source that it was announced.-- Will C  02:55, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

http://www.tnawrestling.com/component/option,com_wrapper/Itemid,149/ I think this is a good source.71.188.5.136 (talk) 03:02, 15 September 2008 (UTC)linknumbers


 * Okay that is link for some reason isn't working on my end but I finally got to TNA's web site and it is official. It is alright to add it.-- Will C  03:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Bound For Glory In Chicago
TNAWrestling.com reported that Bound For Glory IV is gonna be held at the Sears Centre Arena in suburban Hoffman Estates, Ill. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ewitner (talk • contribs) 20:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah that is already in the article. Someone placed it in there and I made it a reference.-- Will C  21:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Name

 * Bound for Glory IV isn't the official name. On the promotional video it does have the signature but that doesn't mean it is the name. The video name was Bound for Glory 2008. Why should it be changed? TNA hasn't called it Bound for Glory 4.-- Will C  06:41, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately it does mean it's the current name of the event. This is just like every year when a new WrestleMania logo is released. Take this year for example. Even though the event in the promotional video wasn't verbally referred to as WrestleMania XXV, we use the logo as reference. The same format is applied here. And as for TNA not calling it Bound for Glory IV, I suggest you take a look at the press release that officially refers to the event as Bound for Glory IV,.
 * "TNA Wrestling is announcing that “Bound For Glory IV” will be held live at the Sears Centre Arena in suburban Hoffman Estates, Ill., on Sunday, Oct. 12, starting at 8pm ET / 5pm PT, and will air worldwide exclusively on Pay-Per-View.... Tickets for “Bound For Glory IV” will go on sale August 1 at all Ticketmaster outlets, online at Ticketmaster.com and at the Sears Centre Arena box office. Full details will be available in the coming weeks.... The “Bound For Glory IV” weekend kicks off Oct. 11 with TNA’s popular Fan Interaction, where fans will get to meet the in-ring stars of TNA, get their autograph and have a photo taken alongside the stars of TNA."
 * Quite honestly, this should have been moved a long time ago. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 06:53, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Just in case that isn't enough... -- Unquestionable Truth -- 07:05, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I understand that now but they still haven't said something like "This year Bound for Glory four will be in Chicago Illinois at the Sears Centre" on Impact or TNA today. I just feel it is moving a little fast at changing the article. They could start saying Bound for Glory 4 or could keep calling it Bound for Glory 2008. I just feel with 2 very good sources it still isn't enough. You need actual footage that is the official name. I just want to make sure. On the promotional video on youtube it says Bound for Glory 2008. So I'm still a little skeptical.-- Will C  07:31, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Where in this video is this event referred to as Bound for Glory 2008 other than the title of the video? It is ridiculous to think the name of the video on youtube is a higher authority over the video itself. The Logo is there (your actual footage), the official press release is there, and even the venue's website lists the event as "BfG IV". -- Unquestionable Truth -- 07:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The question is! Why would TNA have the title of the video Bound for Glory 2008, instead of Bound for Glory IV? Maybe I'm being stubborn. Like you said in summary when you moved the article Guess who went all WrestleMania on us. I guess I'm in denial and trying to find a excuse for it to not be true. I watch TNA because it is different than WWE and now they've went WWEish. But anyway, The press releases are months before the event. The name could be changed and their only using the Roman Numerals to promote the event. I believe I remember last year seeing a promo for BFG 07 that had Roman Numerals and it was still BFG 07. Anyway why would the title be 08 instead of IV.-- Will C  07:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Because as of now it is the current name of the event. If they decide to change the name of the event again before the event then this article will also recognize that change. Take WMXXIV for example. It was called WrestleMania 24 when it was first announced and it ended up being called WrestleMania XXIV in the end. Things can change. However for now the name of the event is Bound for Glory IV, and believe me, I know how you feel about the WWEish thing. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 07:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay. I agree. We'll leave it like it is. I just wish TNA would announce these things in advance like WWE. Announce BFG 09 right after BFG 08 TNA. Thanks. Hopefully they'll quit this crap and go back to their ways in 05. Oh yeah, I got Genesis (2008) for you on the IV.-- Will C  07:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh thank you. My apologies for missing that and for the late responses. I was reading some comments on youtube... -- Unquestionable Truth -- 08:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * (I so wish I could cuss right now). Also thanks for getting that 12th on the Sears Centre article. I know this should go on the BFG talk page instead of this one but do you think we should change the other BFG articles to have Roman Numerals?-- Will C  08:07, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually I don't think that would be possible since this is the first event to use roman numerals. The others have only been known as BfG only. Maybe if TNA went back and retconned all of those events to have roman numerals, we might be able to recognize that change ala Super Bowl I. Even so, why would you want to change them to have roman numerals? I thought you were against it. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 08:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Well if that is the way TNA wants to go with it and I've heard something about TNA owning websites like Bound for Glory II and Bound for Glory III. Just was thinking about it. I'm starting to come out of denial. Come on TNA has Russo. I should have expected this to happen. Also just for you to know it is BFG not BoG.-- Will C  08:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Typo... or it could mean something else not appropriate for the Wiki... -- Unquestionable Truth -- 08:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Nah it was a typo XD-- Unquestionable Truth -- 08:26, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay. Well I guess we reached a conclusion that it is left as is until said otherwise by TNA.-- Will C  08:32, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed.-- Unquestionable Truth -- 08:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Alright. Hey we made the article bigger. Like anyone gives a crap.-- Will C  08:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

"This will be TNA's first PPV to be referred to in Roman Numerals instead of by year." Is that an accurate statement? Wasn't TNA Slammiversary 2007 the first to have the use have Roman Numerals. Take a look back at its promotional poster, you will see the V stands out from Slammiversary. It may not have been the fifth Slammiversary pay-per-view, but it was TNA 5 year anniversary so a V was emphasize that. So what do you guys think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.251.212.100 (talk) 02:03, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That can be changed later but it is meant to be referring to Bound for Glory.-- Will C  02:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok. Yeah, I know the quote I mention above was referring to Bound for Glory. I'm just saying since the quote above said BFG-IV is the first to be refer in Roman Numerals, it isn't accurate as Slammiversary 2007 was the first to use Roman Numerals. Also it should be noted that back in the days when TNA ran weekly pay-per-views, Roman Numberals were use for each week. Like week 30 of the pay per view was call Total Nonstop Action Week XXX. Well this was how it was on DirectTV, not sure about other providers. So then two points that can be concise to one point, I guess, TNA Slammiversary 2007 would be the first monthly pay-per-view to have the use of Roman Numerals.


 * Maybe, though Slammiversary has the V up high, it is noticeable but it doesn't mean they are referring to V. They have 5th anniversary down below. I'll figure it out later.-- Will C  18:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Styles-Cage-Booker
What is the deal with some guy constantly removing the Cage-Booker-Styles 3-way match, noly to reinstate it himself 5 minutes later? Odd eh.41.245.143.65 (talk) 08:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * You need a source. I never said it wasn't happening. Now next time bring a reliable source and you can add it. Impact! has not aired and TNA has no acknowledged it then it can not be added with a reliable source. Impact! aired and said it was going to happen, that is why I placed it in because it was announced.-- Will C  18:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

3 Way Dance
Doesn't a three way dance refer to an elimination style match? If this is just TNA calling it a 3 way dance do we have to as well otherwise it's a bit misleading. Tony2Times (talk) 13:09, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * TNA titles their's 3 Way Dance's. We can not call it a Triple Threat since that is a WWE match name. It would be better to go by what TNA has titled the match.-- Will C  18:08, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * TNA has used the Triple Threat Match term in the past before. 70.68.62.37 (talk) 21:40, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

TNA have started calling it 3-way dance. WCW used the exact same name for their triple threat matches. And it's not elimanation.Ruthless-paki (talk) 21:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * 3 Way Dance is what they called it when they announced the matches. It is accurate if it stays this way. Elimination or not. They called AJ vs Angle at Hard Justice a Last Man Standing match when it was really a Texas Death match. It is just simpler to leave it like it is.-- Will C  00:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * TNA doesn't have the right to call their matches Triple Threat or Fatal Four Way because it is copyrighted for WWE ,thus that is the reason why WCW and TNA call their matches 3-way dance and Four Way Dance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miroa12004 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Dark match result before Bound For Glory PPV
that Eric Young and an unidentified woman from Second City Wrestling defeated Lance Rock and Christy Hemme From Wrestleview.com & PWInsider

it wont let me edit it APWFAN69 09:36AM, 13 October 2008 (PST)


 * Fixed.-- Will C  16:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Event
Is there anyone currently editing this event. Talking about the matches??Ruthless-paki (talk) 20:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I am working on it in a sandbox. I did not expand the article in the open since I did not want ips screwing with the background and making it sound terrible and having the out of universe debate on here. I'll have the article finished around Turning Point (2008).-- Will C  20:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you could put in how they were defeated (ie the last move done) for now, to stop people moaning that the table doesn't tell you how they lost the match. Tony2Times (talk) 17:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Maybe when I get done watching the event. There is no background so I'm pretty sure they think there isn't going to be an event. But I do know Sting won with the death drop, JJ won with a guitar shot, Beer Money pinned Hernandez after he went through a table with thumb tacks, Taylor Wilde pinned Roxxi with a bridged German Suplex, Booker T won with an ax kick on Cage, Jay Lethal climb out of the cage, Rhino gored Kip, I believe that is all of them.-- Will C  19:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Attendance
The wrestling observer newsletter is reporting that the attendance was 5500 with 4500 paid for tickets,change the info please,Omar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.241.151.161 (talk) 06:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Bound for Glory IV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6LDla2zy5?url=http%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.howstuffworks.com%2Fpro-wrestling.htm to http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/pro-wrestling.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151205200547/http://www.searscentre.com/ to http://www.searscentre.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)