Talk:Bovista pila/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (talk · contribs) 10:01, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Everything really looks good to go...but for File:Bovista_pila_406222.jpg, the image still has the photography band included. I feel semi-OCD peeved by that...lol. Can we get that cropped out? :) --  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  10:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Rcej, thanks for reviewing the tumbling puffball. The electron micro pic has been trimmed. Anything else? Sasata (talk) 18:50, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I think that's everything! BTW, are you going to DYK this?  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  06:20, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I didn't have any plans to do so. Feel free if you see a hook that needs be exposed to the world! Sasata (talk) 16:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Bovista pila passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: