Talk:Bowden, Ashprington

Too many problems to count
I don't really know where to start with a clean-up. It's not clear to me whether the building is intended to be notable in and of itself (meaning, presumably, its architecture), or on account of the putative notability of the folks who've inhabited it.

Further discussion here.

The first half appears to be a copyright violation, copied-and-pasted from, perhaps, an unpublished monograph. I've done what I can to clean that up, trim and summarize. But then I got to the second half, which is basically just a big-ass list of people, also presumably copied-and-pasted from other sources.

Does anyone care enough about this article to make an argument in favor of the notability of its subject?

Bill Woodcock (talk) 00:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok, substantial clean-up done, probably good enough for now. Bill Woodcock (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Edit to top bit done. Added infobox. Genealogy not really my area of expertise so left that. Hope I've helped. EPEAviator (talk) 21:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)