Talk:Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co.

Case frequently quoted
A section on quotes from this case could be added.

Quotes from the opinion of this case are found being used in several other aspects of income tax issues.

Notably: "A statute is so vague as to violate the due process clause .... & ...holding of the Pollock court related to income from capital investments, it is submitted the 16th Amendment is irrelevant to an issue of wages/salaries. Agreement is found in Bower v Kerbaugh-Empire, 271 US 170, 174 (1926) and Eisner v Macomber, 252 US 189, 206 (1920). among others 16:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.80.36 (talk • contribs)

Dear user at IP 76.177.80.36: I'm not sure what you are driving at here. These quotations are not found in the text of the case of Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire. I'll check Eisner v. Macomber and get back to you. Yours, Famspear (talk) 18:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Dear user at IP 76.177.80.36: OK, the quotations are not from Eisner v. Macomber either. The quotations have been removed from the article. Famspear (talk) 19:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Redirects needed
Done. BD2412 T 22:16, 2 December 2005 (UTC)