Talk:Bowman Gilfillan

Proposed deletion
This page is unambiguously promotional, and its entire content is a copyright violation that was removed before being reinserted again. Please refer to the article history --93.186.22.120 (talk) 21:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have referred to the article history as you suggest, and have found that there are previous versions that are not unambiguously promotional and not copyright violations, so there is no reason to delete this. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Understood, however, why has no administrator addressed the user who has now twice inserted the same copyright violating and promotional material?93.186.22.122 (talk) 21:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)