Talk:Boys' Ranch/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

OK, good to go. I am happy to awrad this article GA status. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Well written, I made one minor copy-edit, follows the MoS adequately
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All online references check out. I asume good faith for off line sourcing. Sources appear to be reliable.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article is broad enough and focussed. I can't think of much more that could be said.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * the licensing tag on File:Simonkirbyphoto.jpg is incorrect. It is not a "non-free comic" it is a photo of the authors, although it appeared in a comic book reprint. I have changed it to Non-free historic image, which I think is more accurate and hopefully correct
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Thanky kindly fer some mighty fine evaluatin' pawd'nuh - me and the the boys' is much oblidged! --Scott Free (talk) 16:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for doing the assessment and well done everyone who worked on the article!! (Emperor (talk) 03:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC))