Talk:Brøndby IF

Moved to Brøndby IF
I've moved the page as this better conforms to standards used both by the club and (it seems) by other Danish clubs. Please leave a message here if you intend to move it back. -- Elisson | Talk 00:00, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

GA
I have promoted this to good article status. It met most of the criteria, but failed on one which I have fixed myself - most of the images were appropriately tagged, but the logo was being used as fair use without a rationale. In fair use cases, it is not enough to include a blanket fair use tag to an image page, as each individual use needs to be justified. Since Image:Brøndby IF.png is being used here to illustrate the team it is the logo of, this should easily be sufficient rationale, so I added that to the image description page. (The bottom line is that although it is fair use here, it would not be fair use if used utterly gratuitously elsewhere - the context is important, which is why a note about the particular context needs to be appended to the image page). Well done to the editors on an excellent article; with a bit of work there is no reason for this not to become a featured article :-) TheGrappler 22:28, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I think this is an excellent article that doesn't need all that much work to become a featured article. I've been looking at three other featured articles about football clubs (Arsenal F.C., IFK Göteborg and Manchester City F.C.) and compared to those it needs a section about the colours, crest and supporters. I don't know if this is a flaw in this article, but it seems strange that the section about Brøndby Stadium is larger than the main article about Brøndby Stadium. Anyway, with this done I think it should be submitted for a peer review, so it could become a featured article soon. --Maitch 22:01, 11 April 2006 (UTC)


 * This page is a NPOV nightmare. Where to begin? How about "Brøndby have Denmarks best supporters" - and goes downhill from there. Who has the energy to start cleaning up this mess. Not me, but seriously, good article status?? --VeryGimpy 21:47 12 June 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.82.221.188 (talk)

TfD nomination of Template:Danish 2nd Division E
Template:Danish 2nd Division E has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. ka la  ha  15:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Wrong logo
The club logo is wrong. I mean the actual logo of Bröndby IF is this with the year on the bottom.--91.3.76.137 14:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Brøndby IF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060806161423/http://www.brondby.com:80/article.asp?aid=33492 to http://www.brondby.com/article.asp?aid=33492

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:51, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Brondby logo.png

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Brondby-logo.png