Talk:Brad Troemel

Untitled
This person has only a few years of work to stand by and is currently working towards the graduate degree for the field in which he is supposedly noteworthy. This page is premature. Madchalet (talk) 20:58, 22 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I still tend to agree with this. Almost nothing is cited to reliable secondary sources. There are several interviews of Troemel about his websites, but these are hardly critical commentaries from experienced journalists! If someone re-nominated this for deletion I'd be inclined to vote 'delete'. Sionk (talk) 20:32, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Re-nominated
Re-nominated based on the fact that this still reads like a resume. The subject is still in grad school, and the pertinent links all refer back to either a blog site on Tumbler, or a shop on Etsy. Without the reference from Wikipedia there is virtually no notability whatsoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harryjoy (talk • contribs) 00:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Subject is not in graduate school, and the page has been updated to reflect that.--Theredproject (talk) 19:50, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Does not meet notability guidelines
References are both Rhizome articles by same author. Multiple secondary sources from separate established publications are required to establish notability as noted in the notability guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.68.70.52 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 12 December 2012‎ (UTC)

I know brad
I know brae troemel personally. I stand by the decision to keep this page up to date. I think it is good that there is a page about bra. The The is that most of the you don't udnerstand is tat just b/c someone is stil in school doesnt mean they shoudln have a wikipedia page. For isntance, look at many artists who have featured warticles on wikipedia. Thanks.. _Benjamim Moskovitz, Friend of the New Museum — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.204.184.143 (talk) 07:43, 26 December 2012 (UTC)