Talk:Brad Trost

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Brad Trost. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090604092701/http://www.howdtheyvote.ca:80/member.php?id=290 to http://www.howdtheyvote.ca/member.php?id=290

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Brad Trost. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://network.nationalpost.com/NP/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2010/04/29/brad-trost-free-trade-for-colombia.aspxirst
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090626075850/http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/dsib-tour.nsf/eng/qq00166.html to http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/dsib-tour.nsf/eng/qq00166.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304045200/http://www.elections.ca/content2.aspx?section=can&dir=cand%2Fcanlim&document=index&lang=e to http://www.elections.ca/content2.aspx?section=can&dir=cand%2Fcanlim&document=index&lang=e
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.howdtheyvote.ca/member.php?id=290

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brad Trost. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160202014046/http://www.thestarphoenix.com/news/Trost%2Bunder%2Bfire%2Bover%2BPlanned%2BParenthood%2Bremarks/4653617/story.html to http://www.thestarphoenix.com/news/Trost+under+fire+over+Planned+Parenthood+remarks/4653617/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:19, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

anti-choice vs. pro-life
My undertanding is that wikipedia uses "anti-choice" rather than "pro-life" as it's more accurate and unbiased. Can you explain why you are editing to use "pro-life" here? Hirolovesswords BlewsClews (talk) 17:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * In this article the term "pro-life" is only used in the names of two organizations, the Pro-Life Caucus and the Saskatchewan Pro-life Association. It would be inaccurate to call the groups by other names. Hirolovesswords (talk) 19:43, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * But the "pro-life" caucus is not a proper noun, as it is not a formal caucus like the party caucuses are.Hirolovesswords I defer on the "Saskatchewan Pro-Life Association because it is the name of an actual organization. BlewsClews (talk) 02:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The Parliamentary Pro-Life Caucus has been around since 1998 and appears well-established under that name --Hirolovesswords (talk) 14:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * That article doesn't prove a caucus is a formal organization. "Pro-life" here is just a basic descriptor. Caucuses aren't a formal arm of parliament. It's just a group of MPs stating their common agreement on a given topic. There could be a "pro-bitcoin" or "pro-cat" caucus and be the same. Also, your article is from "Canada's Life and Family Magazine" so whatever nominclature that magazine uses is obviously biased. Wikipedia's standard language here should cleary be "anti-choice." Note the lack of capitalization as well. BlewsClews (talk) 00:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I agree. Anti-choice redirects to Anti-abortion movements, perhaps due to this discussion, and so does pro-life, so if this had been all about usual Wikipedia terminology (which it isn't but which might have been appropriate for WP:MOS talk) maybe "anti-abortion" would get slight preference. The poorly justified change to "Anti-Choice Caucus" was by 207.195.10.21 who also changed "traditional" to "regressive". Peter Gulutzan (talk) 20:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)