Talk:Brahmamgari Matham

Navaratna Mandapam and Veda Pathashala
On 17 April 2015 Vin09 removed the following section and image indicating: added see also section. However, no "see also section" was added.
 * Navaratna Mandapam and Veda Pathashala
 * Navaratna mandapam.jpg Mandapam]]
 * 500 years ago, Sri Veerabrahmendra Swami, prophesied in kalagnanam (knowledge about the future) that a temple would be constructed in Kandimallayapalle (Brahmamgari Mutt) in Kaliyuga before his arrival. Sri Patnala Sanyasi Rao, an Industrialist from Chennai, was destined to be the builder of this temple at Brahmamgari Matam. The architectural style of this temple is termed navaratna, as nine temples are associated in one structure.
 * Sree Heramba Ganapathi Temple on South East corner,
 * Manu brahma (Shiva) temple with Adisakthi (Parvathi) is in the East,
 * Maya brahma (Vishnumurthi) with Parasakthi (Lakshmi) is in the South,
 * Twasthabrahma (Chaturmukha Brahma) with Itcha Sakthi (Saraswathi) is to the West,
 * Shilpi brahma (Indra) with Kriyasakthi (Sachidevi) is at the North,
 * ViswagnaBrahma (Surya) with Gnanasakthi (Sanja Devi) is at Northeast,
 * Vishwakarma (vedaPitha) with Gayathri Deva (Vedamatha) is at the center,
 * Venugopala swamy temple at the Southwest,
 * Sri Sanari vishewswara swamy at the northwest and 125 Gothra rishi idols are installed in the temple premises.
 * A Veda Pathashala (school) is being run on this temple premises.

No reason was given for the deletion, and if it in fact verifies, then it is an important part of the village. There are a several videos purporting to show thw site: here, here and here --Bejnar (talk) 04:17, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I might have posted wrong summary. But the reason is it is not a temple article. It is settlement. The temple articles are totally different like Tirumala, Tirumala Venkateswara Temple. But as per census of India 2011, there was no mention in the respective mandal. Google maps also shows it with different name. I'm unsure after checking some references. I hope you can move ahead, we will see if any more suggestions come up.-- Vin09 &thinsp; (talk)   06:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Actually, most temples do not have their own articles, and are discussed instead in a paragraph or two, sometimes only a sentence, in the article on the place where they are located. As you may notice, the Narayana Swamy temple was moved back here after a discussion about its separate article at Articles for deletion/Narayana Swamy Ashramam. The distinction that you are drawing between "temple articles" and "settlement articles" does not apply.  It is just like with minor battles, while major battles have their own articles, minor battles are usually discussed in the article that is about the place where the battle occurred, and that is often a settlement article. --Bejnar (talk) 18:01, 29 December 2015 (UTC)