Talk:Brand loyalty

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 May 2020 and 3 July 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jade71u.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:12, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Discussion
This page reads like an instruction manual to marketing people in some parts.. I think the style needs to be cleaned up Nano Dan (talk) 16:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Merges?
We have a lot of small articles on different concepts involved in branding and I wanted to get some third opinions on which ones should and should not be merged. From my perspective most of these can be merged into Brand for definition (noun) type concepts and Brand management to describe the act, profession or different strategies/approaches/concepts to managing it. Brand Loyalty is too big of a concept and has a lot of ok content for us to lump it into the Brand or Brand Management articles, but there are several articles that relate to Brand Loyalty-related concepts. Corporate 20:32, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brand loyalty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130212100753/http://www.themasb.org/common-language-project/ to http://www.themasb.org/common-language-project/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130212100753/http://www.themasb.org/common-language-project/ to http://www.themasb.org/common-language-project/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Edits
The construction and caution sections of this article contain "weasel words" meaning the sentences and words used contain biases. I will go ahead and attempt to clean this up by rewriting elements of this section, and being more considerate of the writing style used in order to follow Wikipedia criteria. I will also add new information to both these sections in order to "beef up" the article and add credibility by including peer-reviewed sources. Lythammari (talk) 22:30, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictures
Hello all, Adding more pictures with the examples might be a good idea to make this article easier to read. Jade71u (talk) 05:19, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Tag bombing
Although this article has significant issues, it also had excessive tag-bombing that made parts of the article almost unreadable, due to the presence of maintenance tags every few words. I have consolidated them into a cleanup-rewrite tag at the top of the page.

Anyone wishing to fix these problems may still refer to this diff to see which of the sentences have issues. There were many "clarification needed" and "definition needed" tags because the page did not define these terms properly, but there were also some "who?" and "non-sequitur" tags. – Epicgenius (talk) 00:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC)