Talk:Brandtocetus

Comments
This is a valid, notable subject, albeit a stub, and while it is a little too technical for a general encyclopedia (jargon should be clearly defined and/or linked), and needs an appropriate Taxobox, I see no reason it shouldn't be an article, although like most stubs it could always use improvement. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Agreed. Stubs have great value when they lead to a reliable source. I have no issues with the tone. Raggz (talk) 19:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I've just accepted this article at AFC, I added a taxobox adapted from a related genus. The article probably needs some tweaking by subject specialists. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)