Talk:Brasilodon

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brasilodon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081202160307/http://www.sbpbrasil.org/home.htm to http://www.sbpbrasil.org/home.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Merge proposal
Hi, I'm proposing to merge Brasilitherium and Minicynodon into this page, since recent studies (like Guignard et al. (2019) and Cabreira et al. (2022)) interpret them as synonyms of Brasilodon. All three genera belong to the same formation and have a very similar anatomy, and they have been suspected of being synonymous since 2010 at least (see Liu & Yates (2010) for example). —Trilletrollet [ Talk &#124; Contribs ] 18:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * And given that Brasilodon appears to be the only valid brasilodontid, should the family also be merged into this article? Magnatyrannus (talk &#124; contribs) 19:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, probably. Most of the things that can be said about Brasilodontidae could be included in the classification section of the Brasilodon article. —Trilletrollet [ Talk &#124; Contribs ] 20:39, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Support I agree with Trilletrollet's analysis, also suppporting redirecting Brasilodontidae. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:49, 3 October 2022 (UTC)