Talk:Bratz Ponyz 2

Deproding
Hi ,

In the future, when you deprod a proposed deletion, explaining why would be helpful. Do you intent on improving this article? soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Well as You can see from *cough* *cough* reading the page it says I dont gotta post a reason when I delete that tag . BatmobileFire (talk) 16:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * No, you're not obligated to do so, but it would certainly be the civil thing to do. So why did you remove the prod tag? And why are you writing "*cough* *cough*"?  soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 17:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * You admit theres no need; so why the fuss . BatmobileFire (talk) 00:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I also said that explaining would be the civil thing to do, which you haven't done so far. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, editors work together. If you deprod it without any further input, it means others will have to clean up after you. Considering you have a total of 46 edits since January this year, it just might be you're not completely familiar with Wikipedia guidelines. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:33, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm going to put this article up for afd soon. It shows no notability and its common for Bratz cruft to be created for no reason.&#42;Treker (talk) 12:03, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, you should always give a reason for why you disagree with a deletion. That's how things work on wikipedia.&#42;Treker (talk) 12:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * In their defence,, WP:CONTESTED does say "You are encouraged, but not required, to..." (something I do not agree with though, obviously). soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I also don't agree with the not required to part. People should always motivate their opinions on deletions. They don't have to but they should.&#42;Treker (talk) 21:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)