Talk:Brave New World (1998 film)

article quality
I just read through this article and it's not very good at all. Aside from the first template which already noted that the article does not stand on its own two feet, the text seems a bit haphazardly written and even "contradicts" itself as if there were two voices writing the article. I have not seen the movie myself so I cannot provide any relevant information. More needs to be added from someone who is more knowledgable. --Stux 20:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Not necessarily. The closing credits credit a role of an unnamed 'Beta-plus receptionist' (the Epsilon caste is indeed missing, however). On the other hand, these 'subclasses' are not otherwise mentioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.135.48.138 (talk) 06:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The movie leaves out both the Epsilon caste (the lowest of the five classes) and the plus/minus distinctions

The film does not follow the plot of the book. In the film Marx is not portrayed as someone who doesn't really look or act like an Alpha, in fact he's the opposite. His friend, Helmholz, doesn't even exist in the film. In the film Linda was a savage seduced by a civilized man, instead of being born in the civilized world and left in the savage area by mistake after visiting with Thomas. In the book there was no murder plot, no helicopter crash, Thomas hangs him self instead of falling off a cliff by mistake. I could go on endlessly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:1405:352:508C:AC99:110E:B450 (talk) 19:36, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Question of copyright holder
I am curious who is copyright holder.

I suppose it is distributor?

I also think, that would be good idea, if wiki Movie pages included such info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.206.6 (talk) 17:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)