Talk:Bravo Detachment 90

Speedy Deletion
Dont make me laugh!!! : )

There are TWO LINES of text and although similar to source material, it has been changed. (Archangel1 (talk) 13:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC))


 * Barely, and the copy/paste is very obvious. Copyright infringement is not limited to lengthy sections. Taking one sentence, or two, still violates WP:COPYVIO, particularly when it is the entire content of the article. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 13:59, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * OK then, so how do you look at source material which is limited availabilty without have some similarities in the end product? I think you are being over-dramatic in this case and your Speedy Deletion notice is cracking and egg with a sledgehammer (Archangel1 (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2008 (UTC)).


 * If there is limited source material and all anyone can say about it is two sentences, then its a likely sign the topic isn't notable and should be deleted anyway. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 14:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It should be straightforward enough to restructure the sentences so that they're not clear cut and paste yet still convey what limited information there is.
 * That said I don't consider SOC.com as a reliable source in the context of Wikipedia content guidance so something more authoritative would be useful.
 * ALR (talk) 14:07, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

I agree with you about SOC.com and that is mearly one source (Archangel1 (talk) 14:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)).

The problem with creating a page where most of the source material is not in your native tongue makes sourcing material hard. I have mearly opened up the page in thehope that those with more insight can contribute and give the piece more depth (Archangel1 (talk) 14:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)).

Speedy declined. Text is similar, but clearly not verbatim.  AK Radecki Speaketh  15:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed page merge
I've just closed this article's AfD as keep, and the merge notice caught my eye. On finding no explanation or discussion of this here, I am removing the tag. If you would like to discuss merging it, you may re-add the tag provided that you give rationale and open discussion here. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 03:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Um, did you read the AfD? It was brought up there. The proposed merge was because the other article is an older article about the same group...also, that AfD really wasn't an appropriate one for a non-admin closure, considering that circumstance.-- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 03:46, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge it. Ominae (talk) 07:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Bravo Detachment 90. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081013124353/http://www.angkasa-online.com:80/12/10/breaking/break19.htm to http://www.angkasa-online.com/12/10/breaking/break19.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)