Talk:Brazil v Germany (2014 FIFA World Cup)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 16:18, 4 May 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

This seems to be almost without flaws. Just some minor things:
 * I'd say the lead is slightly too long. You might wanna consider cutting the last sentence. Maybe the sentence about the referee is also not necessary here?
 * You say it is only the second game between Brazil and Germany at a World Cup. There was however a game between the East Germany national football team and Brazil in 1974. You should probably add a sentence about that.
 * You should add an inline citation to the Kroos-caption, even though you are giving the reference later in the text.

That's about it. Thank you for a great article about a great game! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:58, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Cut some of the lead, added a note regarding East Germany and a ref to Kroos. See if anything else is needed. (and how appropriate, a Brazilian nominator - from the state where the game happened! - and a German reviewer) igordebraga ≠ 22:33, 9 May 2015 (UTC)


 * It's a pass! Congratulations! This time, you win ;) Zwerg Nase (talk) 01:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC)