Talk:Brazilian monitor Ceará/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:56, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * 1) Per WP:CITESHORT the notes need the year of publication added.
 * That's a guideline, not a requirement.


 * 1) Donato, Hernâni (1996) (in Portuguese) needs an ISBN added
 * OCLC # added instead


 * 1) The external link Brief history of Ceará (Portuguese) is dead
 * Deleted.


 * 1) There is a difference between the draught imperial measurements between the text 4 ft 11 in–5 ft 0.6 in and the inf box 5.0–5.1 ft
 * Fixed


 * 1) The text also has two tubular boilers while the inf box claims 4 boilers
 * Fixed


 * 1) The lede is a bit small at one paragraph but I can see little to use to expand it
 * Agreed, not a whole lot to work with. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:47, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

--Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Passed GA Jim Sweeney (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)