Talk:Brent R. Wilkes/Archives/2011

Who is Wilkes?
Who is this Brent Wilkes? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/09/AR2006050901903_pf.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whig (talk • contribs)


 * Whig - Your link is broken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.175.225.5 (talk • contribs)

Headquarters
A recent article in the online edition of the community newspaper said the Poway Unified School District may end up acquiring the offices of PerfectWave, Mr. Wilkes' company, located in South Poway. It would be used as a replacement for the current suite of district offices, which are 30-45 years old and overcrowded. 20:03, 20 October 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.175.225.22 (talk • contribs)

Connection to Lewis and Lowery
What about adding a paragraph about the Lewis-Lowery-controversy? It is said to ba a spin-off from the investigation of Wilkes. 20:57, 7 December 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.216.39.193 (talk • contribs)


 * Done (actually, more than a paragraph). John Broughton  |  Talk 22:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Prostitution allegations a separate section?
Looks like the investigation into Wilkes' alleged hiring of prostitutes has expanded to include other people than just Cunningham. This is also, besides the Cunningham thing, the biggest reason for Brents notoriety. Anyone else who thinks it should be expanded and moved inte a separate section? 15:59, 18 December 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.216.38.244 (talk • contribs)


 * I've split the Cunningham section into three subsections. I think new info on prostitution should go into one or both of the last two sections (please don't be shy about inserting it).  I realize that the allegations involve more than Cunningham, but still, "Cunningham and others" will, for the moment, do, I think.  Anyway, if you or someone else adds info to the article, everyone would then be in a better position to evaluate whether that info deserves a separate section.   John Broughton  |  Talk

Fair use rationale for Image:Brent Wilkes.jpg
Image:Brent Wilkes.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)