Talk:Brett Blackledge

Untitled
He is also a noted liberal partisan who pass's of his shabby reporting as objective. He truly has helped drive in the dagger that has killed real journalism. An examanation of his articles have a common denominator of left wing propaganda. His most recent hack job reporting on assumed "favors" on the behalf of sarah palin is a blatant smear commonly seen by partisan bloggers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.60.247.126 (talk) 04:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Blackledge is part of liberal biased shock troops invading alaska
Supposed objective journalist Brett Blackledge was one of many liberal "shock troop "reporters doing the dirty work of the Obama campaign. Blackledge's constant biased disguised as journalism is hard to swallow, as he sniffs around anchorage digging up or creating what ever dirt he can on Sarah Palin. Blackledge is just one of many hatemongers that can not stand the thought of an articulate, pro life, hockey mom on standbye to run the country. He has obviously let his journalistic skills go to the proverbial "dark side". Pride and morals have taken a back seat to honesty and objectivity as Blackledge pimps out his service's for political propaganda.74.60.247.126 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 00:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC).

Adding to the substance of Brett's publications: He wrote a negative story about Sarah Palin. To be just, one on Joe Biden regarding his brother and son's dealings in their hedge fund arena, soaking investors for millions and with at least two pending law suits would do.EqualPress (talk) 00:59, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Was he a liberal partisan shock-trooper when he exposed the elaborate system of nepotism and favor-trading erected by Alabama democrats in his Pulitzer-winning series on the state's 2-year college system, or did he only become a liberal partisan shock-trooper when he began his assignment to investigate Palin's background for the AP? --Dystopos (talk) 03:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Please review post: Not notable and lacks sources
This item lacks sources and is too long. This person is not notable enough to have such a lengthy entry.