Talk:Brett Cooper (commentator)/Archive 1

Zero RS coverage that I can find
I can find zero independent third-party biographical coverage in reliable sources about Cooper. , is there any third-party coverage of Cooper? We can't have a biography of a living person in Wikipedia without that. What's the evidence of notability? - David Gerard (talk) 10:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)


 * That's valid, I added another source I found that was 3rd party coverage but there aren't many other 3rd party articles. There was also another I added, although it wasn't very in-depth. AnonymousEditor95 (talk) 15:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I think it is very strange that you are considering deleting the whole page? Could you please just label the uncertain parts instead? Brett Cooper has a lot of followers and a lot of views so I guess there should still be a wikipedia page for her. Also stating that the page sounds like an ad is ridiculous - there is very little content and none of its advertising? I have found following imdb-link - maybe it is of help?
 * https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4553198/ 212.56.161.2 (talk) 23:07, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If there is no real RS coverage then we cannot have an article. And IMDb is not an RS. The lack of RS may explain why no one found an RS which mentions they are right wing, I don't know but we can't ignore RS requirements just because some editors are desperate to mention certain things. In other words, article deletion may very well be an option but using non RS is a non starter. Nil Einne (talk) 07:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Hate speech
Who gets to decide what is hate speech? 166.181.83.12 (talk) 21:49, 19 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The neutral point of view policy begins by stating "All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic." In our collection of repeatedly-discussed sources, the entry for Media Matters states: "There is consensus that Media Matters is marginally reliable and that its articles should be evaluated for reliability on a case-by-case basis. As a partisan advocacy group, their statements should be attributed." The Media Matters source in the article states:
 * Based on NPOV policy, as well as the current consensus about the reliability of the available source, and the content of the source, I edited the content . I also moved it to a new section in the main article, with MOS:LEAD in mind. We also need to be particularly careful with the addition of contentious content to biographies of living people according to WP:BLP policy, so per WP:BLPRESTORE, I do not think the "participated in hate speech" content should be restored without consensus, compliance with our core content polices, and multiple reliable sources. Beccaynr (talk) 22:14, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * And to be more specific, part of NPOV policy that seems relevant here is WP:WIKIVOICE, and what we can state in Wikipedia's voice at this time with this limited information from this particular source. As discussed in the AFD for this article that closed on May 6, there does not appear to be much independent and reliable coverage of Cooper to help develop a neutral and balanced biography. Beccaynr (talk) 02:44, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * In this case, it is specified Matt Walsh was demonetized according to YouTube’s terms of service, hence YouTube considered his content to be hateful and YouTube ultimately took the decision whether his video was hateful or not. 2605:B100:511:E677:E4F9:D36A:E336:14D1 (talk) 03:29, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * According to Media Matters, "YouTube confirmed the demonetization, with a spokesperson writing, “We suspended monetization on Matt Walsh’s channel due to repeated violations of our YouTube Partner Program policies, which include our Advertiser-Friendly Guidelines. These policies apply equally to all creators, regardless of political viewpoint, and channels that repeatedly violate these policies are demonetized."" This seems to say YouTube demonetized according to its policies, without providing detail to support an attribution to YouTube.
 * So these sources do not appear to support stating that YouTube considered his content to be hateful. Even if the sources did, it would seem appropriate to attribute the statement to YouTube instead of stating it in WP:WIKIVOICE - all we currently have is their statement as reported by Media Matters. Beccaynr (talk) 03:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with Beccaynr’s final edit at 3:55 on May 20. It is balanced and well referenced in the way it presents how Cooper “replayed and praised” Matt Walsh’s comments on Mulvaney according to MediaMatters. It doesn’t take sides and is a proper way to present the situation allowing the reader to make their own judgement on whether Cooper was hateful or not. 2605:B100:52E:E87B:3976:686A:73FD:FA16 (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with Beccaynr’s final edit at 3:55 on May 20. It is balanced and well referenced in the way it presents how Cooper “replayed and praised” Matt Walsh’s comments on Mulvaney according to MediaMatters. It doesn’t take sides and is a proper way to present the situation allowing the reader to make their own judgement on whether Cooper was hateful or not. 2605:B100:52E:E87B:3976:686A:73FD:FA16 (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Twitter
Can we use the info on her own Twitter account as verified info? 2600:100C:A202:5967:FDCC:91EA:9E17:F40 (talk) 22:02, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi IP, verifiability is not the only consideration for whether or not to include content, and with regard to these edits :


 * According to WP:DOB, Consensus has indicated that the standard for inclusion of personal information of living persons is higher than mere existence of a reliable source that could be verified. and Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object to the details being made public. If [...] the person is borderline notable, err on the side of caution and simply list the year, provided that there is a reliable source for it. The recent discussion about whether this article should be deleted was closed with no consensus and without prejudice for a speedy renomination, so it appears reasonable to describe Cooper as 'borderline notable' at this time. It was also her employer that posted the birthday greeting, so this seems different than a subject voluntarily publishing their own announcement of their personal information on their own social media, even though she later responded to her employer.
 * Overall, because she is not a public figure, has borderline notability, and did not post her own birthday announcement, WP:BLP policy appears to discourage posting the 'full' part of her birthday (i.e. the month and day) based on this source. However, an approximate birth year could be added from a reliable source that states her age, with the (age age) template - but please note in the list of frequently discussed sources, There is a strong consensus that The Daily Wire is generally unreliable for factual reporting.


 * As to the other content sourced from what appears to be Cooper's Twitter account, Cooper makes claims about third parties, and WP:BLPSELFPUB states this source cannot be used for these claims (and because those third parties did not write it, it appears it should be immediately removed per WP:BLPREMOVE). The source also does not claim 'at the time of her birth', so that part is also not supported by the source. In addition, in the context of the available sources and the content of the article, this content appears to be a WP:MINORASPECT, and therefore WP:UNDUE to include in this article at this time.
 * Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 14:58, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * What makes her not a public figure? 2600:100C:A202:5967:75E9:53AC:166E:3664 (talk) 22:04, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I added the link to that section of WP:BLP policy to try to emphasize the caution we should take for "people who are not well known." This is related to the limited independent and reliable sources that appear to be available to support her notability and the outcome of the discussion about whether the article should be deleted, which also support caution and a need for better sources before adding her full date of birth to the article (according to the WP:DOB section of BLP policy). Beccaynr (talk) 03:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:08, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Brett-Cooper.png

Brett's date of Birth
Brett states her date of birth is October 12, 2001 here yet it was removed from the page. Can this be added back? TomVenam2021 (talk) 10:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 June 2023
Ohiojamajoo (talk) 13:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  13:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 July 2023
Date of Birth: October 12 2001 Nomanslandddd (talk) 07:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Sam Sailor 07:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 August 2023
Terribly terribly biased summary of the comments section. Might as well write “I hate Brett Cooper and her show sucks” instead of imitating an ‘unbiased’ summary of factual information. 72.135.248.185 (talk) 06:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. NotAGenious (talk) 08:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Brett Cooper is a right-wing media personality
This is a right-wing and alt-right media personality and not just a “conservative” personality as some of the editors on this page try to put forward and block or ban anyone who states otherwise. This media personality works alongside personalities such Matt Walsh who are both published by the DailyWire. By listening to her content this is absolutely clear. It should be stated this is a right-wing and far-right media personality. 2605:B100:515:E46:F9CF:42D5:5963:ACAD (talk) 19:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)


 * This is also referenced in this third party reference (IMDb)
 * https://m.imdb.com/name/nm4553198/# 2605:B100:515:E46:F9CF:42D5:5963:ACAD (talk) 20:21, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * According to the policy that applies to article content about living people, "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion."
 * We also can't make a secondary evaluation in Wikipedia's voice based on listening to her content - according to our policy on original research, "Articles may make an analytic, evaluative, interpretive, or synthetic claim only if it has been published by a reliable secondary source." So we need reliable, independent, secondary sources to support the descriptions. But WP:IMDB is not considered a reliable source. Beccaynr (talk) 20:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * IMBd is a perfectly reliable source. You just don’t like what’s written because you’re trying to construct the article as an advertisement for the media personality. You’re biased and you should be barred from editing this article. 2605:B100:515:E46:F9CF:42D5:5963:ACAD (talk) 20:57, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ps. Stating facts is not a personal attack. You refuse to accept a perfectly reliable source and try to mild the page to the benefit of the media personality. You clearly have a bias and should not be allowed to edit this page. 2605:B100:515:E46:F9CF:42D5:5963:ACAD (talk) 21:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * To clarify, this edit summary is the personal attack I was referring to on your user talk page. And at the WP:IMDB link, there is an explanation about how Wikipedia does not consider it a reliable source, so it cannot be used to support the content. If you would like more information about my perspective on this article, you can review the discussion that happened when this article was nominated for deletion. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 21:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * No IMDb isn't reliable for jack shit on Wikipedia. This is very well established. Please refrain from editing BLPs as long as you are so confused about core Wikipedia policies. Nil Einne (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * As accessed on 8/10/2023, IMDb no longer refers to Brett Cooper as "right wing" at the link provided. She is listed as simply "an American Conservative Political Commentator" 96.38.144.10 (talk) 21:11, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Ben Shapiro needs to be linked
I don't have any proof but if he were transgender this would be the outcome. Gerdolfo (talk) 14:30, 2 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Everyone does call her the female Ben Shapiro. That’s what a lot of people know her for. ThatGuyInWiki (talk) 19:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 October 2023
"She moved to LA when she was 10 so she could pursue acting" should really be changed to "her parents moved to LA so she could pursue acting." 10 year olds can't move across the country to pursue acting all on their own. 2601:48:C500:7AA7:6B8A:5ED5:710C:6999 (talk) 02:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the template.  Brendan  ❯❯❯  Talk  05:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2023
change the picture of Brett Cooper to a picture in which she is smiling. Axelle1995 (talk) 12:20, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: The old picture of her scowling has been removed by another editor per WP:BLPIMAGE. At the time of writing, the article is unillustrated. If you have found a suitable image, please upload it to Commons and reactivate this request, linking the photo. Liu1126 (talk) 17:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 December 2023
Would like to add date of birth for subject Brett Cooper. Her date of birth is October 12, 2001. Shotbytim (talk) 21:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 21:51, 3 December 2023 (UTC)