Talk:BrickLink

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Bricklink, formerly Bricklink LLC and now Lego® Bricklink is a commercial platform with thousands of daily users. While the argument can be made that due to Bricklink as of 2018 being solely child of The Lego Group, it should not have an independent article however as per the agreements of conditions of purchase, Bricklink receives a certain degree of autonomy hence it being still labeled by many as an independent platform.
 * Hello @EVaDiSh, Wikipedia looks to the notability, verifiability, and contains no original research. However, popularity is not same as notability or verifiability, and a purchased company not always requires to be mentioned or creating an article; if it doesn't meet those criterias. Ahmetlii (talk) 18:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: Only one of the sources (bloomberg) is an independent, reliable source . Sungodtemple a tcg fan!|!!1!1|11!|!! (talk) 18:47, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The redirect doesn't explain what Bricklink is, however, and is in that regard not particularly helpful. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 16:59, 19 June 2022 (UTC)