Talk:Bridge Publications (Scientology)

Original research tag
The entire article is one big unsourced, WP:OR violation. It should either be sourced meticulously, or cut down to a stub until it can be. Cirt (talk) 10:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I think it should be deleted if it is not notable. There is nothing in the article that most readers would find interesting. The picture isn't even of the subject of the article. Steve Dufour (talk) 21:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't say it wasn't notable, it could very well be notable (Haven't done a search for sources, yet.) I just said it was unsourced in its present state, thus, the tag. Cirt (talk) 21:50, 29 February 2008 (UTC)