Talk:Bridget Ogilvie

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on Bridget Ogilvie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.guardian.co.uk/women-in-leadership/2013/apr/23/dame-nancy-rothwell-break-the-rules
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://royalsociety.org/about-us/terms-conditions-policies/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100828110110/http://www.sciencecampaign.org.uk:80/about/who/advisory.htm to http://www.sciencecampaign.org.uk/about/who/advisory.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070209000847/http://www.mmv.org:80/article.php3?id_article=353 to http://www.mmv.org/article.php3?id_article=353

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Lead Section
The Lead section of this article was very short. I found the Lead section of this article to be relatively underwhelming, and I would say that it does not define the topic well or provide a concise overview of the topic. The Lead section does include a single introductory sentence that describes the articles topic, but it provides a very limited amount of information. Since the Lead section only includes a single introductory sentence, it does not include a brief description of the article's major sections, and would benefit from this addition of this description. One positive aspect of the Lead section is that is does not include any extraneous information that is not present in the article and it is concisely worded; however, the Lead section must include more information in order to provide a better overview of the topic. The only information presented in the Lead section is Ogilvie's nationality and the fact that she is a scientist. I would recommend adding a sentence or two about her research and accomplishments. Isobel.Isobel (talk) 21:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)