Talk:Bridie Gallagher

Fair use rationale for Image:Bridiegallagher.jpg
Image:Bridiegallagher.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Bridie Gallagher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140826113242/http://uk45s.eu/60s/60B/60BELTONA-DISCOG.htm to http://uk45s.eu/60s/60B/60BELTONA-DISCOG.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Shot to fame?
Just wondering if there is a more encyclopedic way of expressing this? 165.228.112.251 (talk) 01:44, 25 February 2022 (UTC)