Talk:Brigalow Belt

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brigalow Belt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090704211613/http://www.anra.gov.au/topics/vegetation/extent/qld/ibra-brigalow-belt-north.html to http://www.anra.gov.au/topics/vegetation/extent/qld/ibra-brigalow-belt-north.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Brigalow Belt South and Brigalow Belt North are biogeographic regions deserving of their own articles??
I do not really understand why Brigalow Belt South and Brigalow Belt North are redirected here. Both deserve a definition of their own. However, since this now seems extremely difficult to do. I have tried to make it more obvious that the interested reader needs to look at IBRA. MargaretRDonald (talk) 04:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Flora section: ce needed
The last sentence of the first para needs some help. It is not possible to discern which tree species "…are now intact primarily on the higher slopes." and all of the presumably helpful but annoyingly innumerable refs are hard copy. I cannot correct this sentence. Boscaswell  talk  08:01, 30 July 2023 (UTC)