Talk:Briggs Automotive Company

Neutrality
To me, this article looks like an advertisement for the car. Someone who has more knowledge than I should comb through it and make it more neutral. And I know there is some template that involves disputes in terms of neutrality, but I don't know what it is. Jscottcc (talk) 00:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Agree, I came to the talk page to say that it reads like an advertisement, but it is already said by Jscottcc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.74.0.10 (talk) 13:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It has been addressed Atlantic306 (talk) 21:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

I do not believe that the issues have been fully addressed yet. In particular, the section on the BAC Mono R contains several adjectives and phrases such as striking, stunning, imposing, left no stone unturned which to my mind is appropriate for a marketing write-up but do not belong in an objective and neutral article. --Frikdt (talk) 19:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Some things openly conflict with other articles such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Top_Gear_test_track_Power_Lap_times This information may just be outdated and it's not very impartial either. Xecten (talk) 22:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC)