Talk:Brighton Forum/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jappalang (talk) 01:38, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Just a few (personal) niggles, but nothing serious to general comprehension.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * "... of Brighton, part of the English city of Brighton and Hove."
 * "Brighton .. Brighton ..." seems a bit repetitive.


 * "... building, by two architect brothers from London ..."
 * Make it more precise with "building, designed by two architect brothers from London ..."?


 * "... has had three greatly different uses since its construction at the edge of Brighton parish in 1854:"
 * Simply "has had three greatly different uses" to "was used for three vastly different purposes"?


 * "... listed it at Grade II ...", "... was listed at Grade II by ..."
 * Is it "at" or "as"? Perhaps, the question should be is Grade II an adjective (Grade II structure) or a noun?
 * From Oxford Dictionary,
 * include or enter in a list:
 * 93 men were still listed as missing
 * [no object] (list at/for) be on a list of products at (a specified price):
 * the bottom-of-the-line Mercedes lists for $52,050

Otherwise, fairly minor prose issues, so passing this as a GA. Jappalang (talk) 01:38, 27 October 2010 (UTC)