Talk:Brigitte Boisselier

Solicitation of Brigitte Boisselier for dating/marriage
Put your text for the new page here.Hello Birgitte.My name is Sanne Modig,I`m from sweden.I have read the text about you on the `Swedich` tv-text on the mytelevision.I`m 27 years old,almost 28,in the 5`thift of feburary this year.I`m not so good too write in English,but I trye,I`m very intresste in your program,`baby`.................:)I think that very much people have whrite to you and they,want too be on your program.I`m a very sure aboute this.Please send me a messege.I wait for your mail.If you don`t see this soo seriuse,please mail me back so I dont site and wait for your mail,or your anserw.Please,I really want this,so please call me,on [number deleted for privacy reasons] or send me a mail on [e mail redacted] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.208.150.161 (talk • contribs)


 * I am sure you can call Brigitte at her day job at Clonaid, loser. you need a net dating service. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.104.158 (talk • contribs)


 * Nice. Being nasty isn't necessary.  -- Zoe


 * Is it a joke??? --noaccount —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.40.177.216 (talk • contribs)


 * I don't blame you, Sanne; she is kind of hot, but I don't think this is an appropriate use of the talk page.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 18:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * She's at least 50 years old.Kmarinas86 19:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

But what has she done lately?
Has Boisselier disappeared from the public eye after her announcements a few years ago?--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 18:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Use of "Dr"
We just use people's names in articles, see Albert Einstein for example. Tim Vickers (talk) 20:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Recent edits are excellent
We obviously have an expert writer fixing up the article on Brigitte Boisselier. In a mere span of days, this article has moved from a stub to what is clearly is a valid candidate for Good article status. Wonderful! (link to recent edits)siNkarma86—Expert Sectioneer of Wikipedia undefined 14:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, I'm glad to hear that you like it. It was a pleasure to research and write! Mark Arsten (talk) 16:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Dead reference links
Despite previous adulation for the professionalism of the page, it remains bizarre that this person warrants more than a stub. References are difficult to verify (and generally won't be verified by casual users, which is a significant problem), there are patches of subtle editorializing within the article, and ultimately it seems that the only reason that this woman has garnered her own page is that she made several fantastic, unverifiable claims. Clearly not a priority, but take this article with a wheelbarrow of salt.--Concerned Editor 01:19 7 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.188.108.183 (talk)

Is this photo accurate?
Photo provided here doesn't look at all like the photos on Google Images, incl. screenshots from C-SPAN. What gives? Time to find a new image? QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 21:37, 27 December 2023 (UTC)