Talk:Bristol Bolingbroke

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:17, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Bristol Fairchild Bolingbroke → Bristol Bolingbroke – WP:COMMONNAME. While built by Fairchild-Canada, just "Bristol" appears to be the most common name used in the literature. I have never seen "Bristol Fairchild" in print, and while gHits are tainted by Wikimirrors, gBooks has '"Bristol Fairchild Bolingbroke"' come up with 6 hits (three Wikiclones, two as "Bristol (Fairchild) Bolingbroke", and one unknown), while '"Bristol Bolingbroke" -Shakespeare' has 492 gBooks hits (at least one as "(Fairchild) Bristol Bolingbroke". - The Bushranger One ping only 10:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Support per nom Bristol Bolingbroke appears to be the more common name in general use. MilborneOne (talk) 16:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments (I'm undecided at the moment): RAF Museum refers to L8756 as "Bristol/Fairchild Bolingbroke". All 136 Blackburn Roc aircraft were built by Boulton Paul (who also did the detail design work). GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Bristol Bolingbroke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101011125607/http://gmam.ca:80/bolingbroke_restoration.htm to http://gmam.ca/bolingbroke_restoration.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100329233157/http://www.lancastermuseum.ca:80/bristol.html to http://www.lancastermuseum.ca/bristol.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100829084733/http://www.bristolaero.com:80/bolingbroke.htm to http://www.bristolaero.com/bolingbroke.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bristol Bolingbroke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224043734/http://www.bcam.net/bc-aviation-museum-aircraft.html to http://www.bcam.net/bc-aviation-museum-aircraft.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:53, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Bolingbroke RAF Cosford
You removed my edit for the Bolingbroke being at the RAF Museum. The sources are already linked up. I saw it at Cosford personally last December. Check all recent YouTube videos. I'm going to put this edit in again as it's correct and it is on display at Cosford. Do not remove my work assuming it's wrong when you haven't been yourself and haven't checked the source evidence which has been updated itself. 2A02:C7E:2899:7900:A4E3:B46C:629D:2298 (talk) 16:40, 26 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I did not remove your content because I assumed it was wrong, but because it was unsourced. Wikipedia requires reliable published sources be included when new content is added. In addition, personal knowledge alone is not acceptable, as it is Original Research. BilCat (talk) 20:31, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Well that's ok. As long as you know that the source material had been updated with this new information so it doesn't need to be removed again. 2A02:C7E:2899:7900:5D96:36B:DE26:6BB8 (talk) 21:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)