Talk:Britannia Trophy

Still a Starter?
I have changed the page format to one of a table, reviewed and (in my eyes) tidied the introduction. I have added the aircraft and, wherever possible, links to the aircraft, with which the recipient earned the trophy. I balked at creating dead-links for the many recipients, I consider a page full of dead-links unsightly and disrespectful - am I in error with this opinion?

I have emailed one of the recipients (who has a web-page) for permission to upload images of him being presented with the trophy, and an image of the trophy itself. Should his response be in the negative, I will add some images of the aircraft to help flesh out the article. I'm not sure adding images of all the linked aircraft would improve the page, it would to me make the page too 'busy'. If only adding a few images, I don't have the heart to choose which ones to exclude. I considered adding an image of the current type winning aircraft type, but have opted for a second opinion.

Most of the additional information I have added was available by way of an already cited source. I cannot see much merit in citing further sources I used given the information gained was more in the nature of confirmation.

It is my opinion, that with the addition of images, this page would no longer deserve the classification of "Start Class".

L-Bit (talk) 07:58, 28 April 2013 (UTC) (19:50, 28 April 2013 NZST)