Talk:British Asian Cup/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 17:36, 29 March 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I'll review this and I think there are a few issues that needs addressing.


 * 1) The lead pic needs a caption
 * 2) Should at least say that Lord's is in England (I know it's obvious but you have to consider the reader who knows little)
 * 3) It was only one match so it shouldn't be described as a series
 * 4) Players when they are first mentioned should have their Christian names and their surnames before using only their surnames afterwards (example: Tanvir in the Build up section)
 * 5) Who decided to move the 2009 CL to South Africa?
 * 6) "and was a day/night one." sound better to say it was a day/night match in my opinion
 * Used event instead of match as match has been already used in the sentence.


 * 1) "Fazal and Asnodkar reached to a 50 run partnership", shouldn't have that to in there
 * 2) Why were the Royals awarded penalty runs?
 * Because the ball was deflected by the wicket-keeper's helmet (I have written this)


 * 1) The pic of Warne seems a bit oversized to me
 * 2) Ref 1: What makes burrp.com a reliable source (I'm just asking as I've never come across it before)
 * Removed


 * 1) Ref 3: IANS or Cricinfo?
 * 2) It should also have an explanation as to why this wasn't made into an annual event
 * None of the sources say anything about that.


 * 1) Check against the previous GA review too

Once these have been sorted, I'll take another look at it.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 17:36, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I do think that if you want improve the article, it would be helpful to find out why this wasn't made into a regular event. Nevertheless, I am happy that this fulfills the GA criteria.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 07:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)