Talk:British National Party/GA2

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:British National Party/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I'm going to fail this article because of the amount of cn, dead link and the formatting of some current references. Please see WP:CITE for how to use references. All web addresses should have the URL, title, author, accessdate and date of any publication. The current referencing looks mish-mash at the moment with the variety of methods used.

But other MOS points that stand out include
 * References should be placed after the punctuation per WP:CITE.
 * Use of single digit numerals. See WP:MOSNUM.
 * Incorrect use of dashes per WP:DASH.
 * Incorrect date formats and unnecessary linking of years per WP:DATE.
 * Introductory clauses, e.g. In December 2006, ... should include the comma.
 * Don't overlink. Nick Griffin is linked eight times.
 * The article could do with more images.

I would suggest a peer review before a third GA nomination is made. Peanut4 (talk) 02:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)