Talk:British Rail Class 700/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: RonaldDuncan (talk · contribs) 14:31, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

My initial impression going through the article is that it is at good article.

My one comment is that the section on bogies could do with a link to Bogie so that people that do not know about bogies can find out more.RonaldDuncan (talk) 14:31, 5 June 2018 (UTC) -- DONE

TODO - Some ref problems see see  https://dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=British_Rail_Class_700RonaldDuncan (talk) 16:18, 5 June 2018 (UTC) Thanks for the changes ref 14 ( ref name="bom" / ) still has links to rail.co which is now a spam site. There is also the link to the archived version of the article, please can you remove the links to the original thanks RonaldDuncan (talk) 11:10, 6 June 2018 (UTC) -- DONE

the following sfn links are broken: Network Rail & ARUP 2009a, Network Rail & ARUP 2011a. Overall, it's unclear which of the 2009 and 2011 citations are a and b. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:19, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for raising the issue, I will look into it tomorrow and try to solve the problem. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * It was broken four years ago by in ; I have fixed it with . If you want the suffix letters to be visible in the long refs, remove the year parameters and restore the letters to the date params. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 23:00, 6 June 2018 (UTC)