Talk:British Rail Class 99 (locomotive)

Why the rename?
Why has the word Stadler been added to the name of this page? The loco page is the primary page and shouldn't need differentiation. If it is felt necessary to distinguish it from the ships page than it shouldn't be the builders name as that won't necessarily be obvious to the non-specialist reader. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 13:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I've moved it to British Rail Class 99 (train) as that is more of a sensible title than Stadler User:Dudleybus User talk:Dudleybus 15:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Still not convinced it needs a suffix as without it conforms with all the other loco classes (Class 70 excepted but both versions were locos). Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:18, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * True, I was trying to make the best out of a bad situation to be fair by renaming it from Stadler to train User:Dudleybus User talk:Dudleybus 17:36, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * As a rule, I would be arguing that page moves should be agreed by consensus on the talk page before being carried out, especially when there's already a discussion in progress, as there was here. Danners430 (talk) 09:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Any further moves will need to be via WP:RM, as I've move protected the article at Admin level. Mjroots (talk) 05:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)