Talk:British Rail Class D3/7

Naming convention
There is a discussion about the naming convention to use for articles about British locomotive and multiple unit classes at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (British railway locomotive and multiple unit classes). Your comments are more than welcome. Thryduulf 22:23, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Possible change to the title of this article
This article is currently named in accordance the WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways, where your comments would be welcome.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on British Rail Class D3/7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100119064527/http://www.photorail.com:80/phr1-leFS/ne700.htm to http://www.photorail.com/phr1-leFS/ne700.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:06, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Rail Class D3/7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007225057/http://www.rail-online.co.uk/ImageView.aspx?id=4f571dd7-58a9-4c67-9751-5f8a0bb43bfd to http://www.rail-online.co.uk/ImageView.aspx?id=4f571dd7-58a9-4c67-9751-5f8a0bb43bfd
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.photorail.com/phr1-leFS/ne700.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:54, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Link for source on current existence checking
Hey I was looking back on my sources for the reddit post that someone else hastily copy-pasted into the original statement that the Class still exists and was wondering if my primary source, https://scalaenne.wordpress.com/2012/01/21/unaltra-locomotiva-di-guerra-la-ne-700/, as well as the wealth of photographic evidence that the locomotive claimed to be 7106 within it is still active, is up to scratch for being officially cited as a source. Tythatguy1312 (talk) 09:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)


 * That looks more like a blog than a reliable source… Danners430 (talk) 10:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I will be perfectly honest and admit I'm at a loss here. Whilst there's plenty of photographic evidence that both 7103 and 7106 survive, the only online evidence I can find is a few scattered blogs, at least 2 photography websites, a reddit post that I personally wrote and, strangely, this article's Italian equivalent. You can rest assured that I didn't write the blogs in question as I was 9 in 2012 and also don't speak Italian.
 * Figured I should at least link the sources I mentioned though.
 * https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locomotiva_FS_Ne_700
 * https://www.hrohrer.ch/railways/htm/ne700.htm
 * https://www.ilportaledeitreni.it/2021/09/14/312490/
 * https://www.reddit.com/r/TrainPorn/comments/tc6shl/the_d37_lives_as_2_preserved_examples_have_been/
 * For obvious reasons I don't intend to cite these as official sources, especially not the Reddit post. Tythatguy1312 (talk) 15:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)