Talk:Britney/Brittany/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 02:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

It has been too long since I have given back and done a GA review. So, on first glance and read-through, the article obviously is not eligible for quick-failing, so the full review is to come soon. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 02:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Full review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Article is done very well in a similar manner to all the other Glee episodes (in their multitude) that have reached GA status. This has been a quick review, but after a few reads and a check of accuracy, references, and images, it is obvious to me that this article meets all GA criteria. So, a quick pass for this excellently done article. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 03:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * There were two or three sentences that I would have not worded the way they are; however, they are mostly from stylistic choice and certainly nothing to worry about in a GAN.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All statements and references check out
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Everything covered here that is appropriate
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * One image properly dolled-up with fair use rationale; two free licenses images, all captioned well.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: