Talk:Brookville Tunnel/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk · contribs) 12:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments:
 * Remember to state the country; Virginia is not a place commonly known by people outside the US. (fixed)
 * Per MOS, don't comma a month–year combination, only date–month–year (fixed, good advice, beyond GA scope)
 * "During the American Civil War..." Years should be included to provide context. Don't simply presume the reader knows when the American Civil War was. (I doubt the average non-American would know this, and even many Americans can't keep track of it). (fixed)
 * I have used the syntax  in one convert template to avoid a double parenthesis. (fixed)
 * Please remember to use endashes for page ranges. (fixed)
 * I have fixed a number of significant digit errors in the convert templates. (fixed)
 * The article states "Today, Interstate 64 passes over the cut that replaced the Brookville Tunnel." I have checked the reference and I cannot understand how this claim is supported.
 * ✅ Sorry about that one, my mistake. The reference should have pointed to a Google Maps view of the cut and Interstate.  I have both provided this and two text references. MountainRail (talk) 22:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Refs 6 and 12 are identical and should be merged using the name syntax; the same goes for 1 adn 26; 7 and 9; 25, 32 and 48; 28 and 30; 16 and 20, and perhaps others I may have overlooked.

Placing on hold. Arsenikk (talk)  12:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review Arsenikk! All the issues you have addressed should be fixed now.  Thanks!  MountainRail (talk) 22:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for writing a good article! Arsenikk (talk)  08:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)