Talk:Brother's Little Helper/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  R uby2010   comment!  19:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

I will review sometime today.  R uby2010  comment!  19:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * There is one dab link
 * Done. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Three refs need dates and access dates
 * Done. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Also with refs, add IGN, not ign.com. A few are missing producers all together.
 * Fixed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The reception section should be in chronological order (opening sentence for instance should be preceded by earlier reviews, if there are any).
 * Couldn't find any earlier reviews, sadly. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It could use another review or two. Also, it needs ratings data (always hard to find I know)
 * I found another review, which I'll add shortly, but that's about it. I also found out that a fictional word from the episode made it to a list of best created Simpsons words, but I'm not sure if that would pass as a "review," per se. I'll try to get my hands on some ratings info too. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I might suggest realigning the Mark McGuire image to the left (just a personal preference so not everything is skewed right)
 * Done. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Wikilink Fox network, Major League Baseball, and Bart in lead
 * Fixed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * "starts paying more attention to his studies" Add bolded
 * Fixed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Clinton was still in office at the time, so remove "former"
 * Fixed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * As always, identify how Meyer and Kirkland relate to show (staff writers? producers? etc)
 * Fixed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Sentences with direct quotes should end with direct citations
 * Fixed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

I'll place the review on hold for seven days while everything gets sorted. Thanks,  R uby2010   comment!  20:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! Not really sure if the article will pass to be honest (mostly because there are so few reviews of the episode, and the entire season as a whole), but I'll do my best! Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I've added a couple of things now. What do you think? Queenieacoustic (talk) 11:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Pass for GA. Nice work,  R uby2010   comment!  17:47, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! :D Queenieacoustic (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2011 (UTC)