Talk:Brown Brothers Harriman & Co./Archives/2013

Comment
It's interesting that Major Gen. Smedley Butler was warning of Brown Brothers as early as 1933, and by extrapolation George H W Bush, founder Prescot's nephew I believe, or possibly his son. Can Wik cement this fact? See: http://www.fas.org/man/smedley.htm

For the Anon editor at IP 66.18.58.45, which is owned by the Chattanooga Times Free Press, refrain from wholesale deletion of references... Also, please find source documents for the Nazi links and the Skull stuff. I would like to read them :) GrEp 14:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Where do the unsubstantiated Nazi claims come from? ("Shipped millions in gold...") I'd like to see the records as well ;) Tad232 23:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

A lot of the stuff seems to be copied verbatim from the company website, which seems like there would be copyright issues in addition to the advertising slant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.14.53 (talk) 03:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Here is an interesting link that discusses the Nazi-Harriman connections. Plus in the larger website is a little info on Harriman and Skull and Bones. This seems like a pretty scant history for such an important and old bank. http://www.tarpley.net/bush2.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennybenners (talk • contribs) 00:03, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Missing a paragraph?
The article seems to be missing a paragraph. Before the list of "initial partners." I believe these are the initial partners of the merged Brown Brothers and Harriman firms, circa 1931? However, immediately prior to that list it is talking about the panic of 1857 and says nothing about Harriman! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.175.72.137 (talk) 12:05, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Repeated Vandalism
For the editor "Enemies within", please refrain from posting your complaints about the article's content within the article itself. Please also refrain from the continued vandalism to the article which includes but is not limited to; citing false sources, writing your opinion of the article at the top and bottom of the page, and editing in small non-cited tidbits regarding the "Nazis" to make it appear as if these are sourced. Also if you wish to see the article improved as you say, we would encourage that you edit the article in a constructive way using factual information cited from verifiable sources. Thank you. Park Ave Historian (talk) 09:26, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Actually, because of the constant re-insertion of these edits, they should be discussed here first to reach a consensus, rather than just added back into the article yet again. – ukexpat (talk) 19:48, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism? Not
reply to Park Avenue

I guess revealing the truth about a bloody organization would be considered vandalism to a company that helped Himmler and Hitler starve, gas, and massacre millions of people. But don't feel bad, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co are not the only accessories to murder and torture, IBM and Mercedes Benz had their greedy hands in the holocaust too. Enemies within (talk) 08:39, 9 May 2009 (UTC)


 * OK the first thing for you to do is provide some references from reliable sources. Note the emphasis on "reliable". Making serious, but unsubstantiated, allegations about these companies is not going to gain any support. – ukexpat (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

I am not looking to get into a "reliable source" war with you. I am not looking to gain support, especilly not from people like you Ukexpet, you always reply with an overtone of arrogance. Its obvious my reliable sources would not be enough for you.

I provided the National Archives at the University of Maryland and the Harriman papers in the Library of Congress as my sources. I can't force you to check these facts, they are in black and white. So please stop saying my edits are unsubtantiated when you haven't checked. Have you checked the sources for the arthur of Brown Brothers Harriman & Co?Enemies within (talk) 00:57, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Well if you are not prepared to seek consensus here, I think this discussion will be short. And please don't resort to ad hominem comments, they do nothing to advance your position – ukexpat (talk) 01:09, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Current partners
Are any notable people currently partners in the firm? 121a0012 (talk) 03:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC)