Talk:Brown truss

I beleve the diagram is incorrect. Not all of the grey members are in compression. for example on the top left there are 3 compression members meeting with no tension member which I don't think is possible. Also the botom strings of the truss will all be in tension. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.178.254.61 (talk • contribs) 07:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I believe you are correct and I was in error. Editors have been making changes to reflect this improved understanding. ++Lar: t/c 20:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brown truss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060928225956/http://www.michigan.org/travel/detail.asp?m=2&p=B5658 to http://www.michigan.org/travel/detail.asp?m=2&p=B5658

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Deep Space Communication Complex is just some random truss
It is not clear to me that the image at the bottom in the gallery is necessarily using a Brown Truss... It has the X per panel that's characteristic but the crossmembers are riveted, not pinned. Yes, it's been there for 10 years or so but I don't think it's justified. (all the other images in the gallery were added by me when I created this article back in the day...) ++Lar: t/c 22:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)