Talk:Bruce Wayne (TV series)

Should we change the title?
The name of the article is Bruce Wayne (TV series). Technically, shouldn't it be titled Bruce Wayne (Unmade series)? That sounds more accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.198.33 (talk) 18:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * It was a planned "television series". The point of the title is to identify the medium, not what is was or wasn't. The lead sentence identifies that it was never actually made.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  21:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Did Wikipedia just get used as a source?
This article, published today, seems to be based on our write-up of the same. Strange? Coincidence? ThuranX (talk) 04:06, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Not sure if it was, but it accentuates with a spiked baseball bat how very important it is to be exceptionally careful that everything is cited to a secondary source. Journalists on deadline are notoriously lazy and sloppy. We have no deadlines, and there is no excuse to not source properly, which is why I am as short-tempered as I am when someone fails to do the work.Remember: No Sherlocking, no Original Research. If a citation doesn't exist that says it, it doesn't go in. Full stop. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 04:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)